1.1 Child pornography is not as difficult a concept as some have made it out to be, although there may be differences in the way it is defined in different countries. However, any differences that may exist relate to, mainly, two aspects:
- the definition of “child”, and
- the exclusion from the definition of the offence of child pornography any pictures created without using a real child and verbal descriptions.
1.2 Child pornography is, simply, evidence of the abuse of a child for the purpose of sexual exploitation and sexual gratification. It not only describes, in words or pictures, a serious crime against a child but constitutes, in and of itself, a criminal offence. In other words, the abuse or exploitation of a child for any sexual purpose is a criminal offence and any description or picture of such sexual abuse and exploitation is also a criminal offence. However, child pornography refers to descriptions or pictures of the sexual abuse and exploitation of a child and not to the actual act of abuse.
1.3 Mostly child protection practitioners, including law enforcement agencies, who have to deal with child pornography agree that the expression “child pornography” does not adequately describe the nature of this despicable crime against children. It is a misleading term because child pornography is not about “pornography” but, simply, the evidence of serious sexual assaults and abuse of children, including , as shocking as it sounds, the penetrative sexual assault of children as young as 6 months. Uninformed commentators on the subject, including members of the judiciary, have failed to grasp an essential truth about child pornography: that it cannot be produced without a child being sexually abused and that its creation and distribution leads to the sexual abuse of more children to satisfy the demand for such pictures. Child pornography is not pornography with child subjects and is an inappropriate term to describe the true nature and extent of sexually exploitive images of child victims. The correct term is “child abuse images”, which is a more accurate description of this plague in our society, as anyone who has had the misfortune to actually see such images would agree. There is no “pornography” in “child pornography” – there is only the sexual assault, torture, the maiming, brutalisation and even murder of young children.
1.4 In terms of South African law, “child pornography” is any picture, regardless of how it was created, or any description, of a real or imaginary person who is under the age of 18 years, or is represented as being under the age of 18 years-
- engaged or involved in any form of sexual activity
- participating in or assisting another person to participate in any form of sexual activity, or
- any picture which shows, or any writing which describes, the body or any part of the body of a real or imaginary person under the age of 18 years in circumstances that amount to sexual exploitation or in a manner that makes it capable of being used for the purpose of sexual exploitation.